Paper detail

Constraints on nonlinear tides due to $p$-$g$ mode coupling from the neutron-star merger GW170817

It has been suggested by Weinberg et al. (2013) that an instability due to the nonlinear coupling of a neutron star's tide to its $p$- and $g$-modes could affect the gravitational-wave phase evolution of a neutron-star binary. Weinberg (2016) suggests that this instability can turn on as the gravitational-waves pass through the sensitive band of ground-based detectors, although the size of the effect is not known. The discovery of the binary neutron star merger GW170817 provides an opportunity to look for evidence of nonlinear tides from $p$-$g$ mode coupling. We compute Bayesian evidences that compare waveform models that include the $p$-$g$ mode coupling to models that do not. Using the waveform model and priors of Essick et al. (2016) we find that the observation of GW170817 is consistent with $p$-$g$ mode coupling, in agreement with Abbott, B. P., et al. (2019a). We investigate the properties of the model and find that this consistency is due to degeneracy in a large region of the parameter space between the the model that includes nonlinear tides from $p$-$g$ mode coupling and the standard post-Newtonian model that does not. We investigate the consistency of the GW170817 signal with regions of the parameter space where the effect of nonlinear tides is not degenerate with the standard model. Regions of the nonlinear tide parameter space that have a fitting factor of less than 99$\%$ (98.5$\%$) are disfavored by a Bayes factor of 15 (25). We conclude that the consistency of the GW170817 signal with the model of Essick et al. (2016) is due to parameter degeneracy and that regions where nonlinear tides produce a measurable effect are strongly disfavored.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.