Paper detail

Constraints on non-universal gaugino mass scenario using the latest LHC data

We investigate exclusion limits on the the non-universal gaugino mass scenario in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM), according the the latest results of the super-particle search at the LHC8 and the LHC13. In this scenario, suitable ratios of wino to gluino mass can realize the observed value of the Higgs boson mass, while keeping a small $μ$ parameter. Such a small $μ$ parameter corresponds to the mass of higgsino, so that lightest neutralino and chargino are higgsino-like and their masses are almost degenerate. Besides, we find that the right-handed top squark tends to be lighter than other sfermions and then the top squark search, where the top squark decays to a quark and higgsino, is relevant to our model. In our analysis, the exclusion limits are derived using the data of the top squark searches in the $bb + E_T^{\rm miss}$ and $tb + E_T^{\rm miss}$ channels. Furthermore, the exclusion limit on gluino mass, which is crucial to our scenario, is investigated as well. The analysis of the gluino is based on the data of the analysis with large missing energy and at least three b-tagged jets at the ATLAS experiment.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.