BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics and opportunities from one place.GraphOpen maps around papers, topics and saved views.

Workspaces

HomeOpen the ranked research feed.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Paper detail

Constraints on jet quenching from a multi-stage energy-loss approach

We present a multi-stage model for jet evolution through a quark-gluon plasma within the JETSCAPE framework. The multi-stage approach in JETSCAPE provides a unified description of distinct phases in jet shower contingent on the virtuality. We demonstrate a simultaneous description of leading hadron and integrated jet observables as well as jet $v_n$ using tuned parameters. Medium response to the jet quenching is implemented based on a weakly-coupled recoil prescription. We also explore the cone-size dependence of jet energy loss inside the plasma.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
C. ParkA. AngeramiS. A. BassS. CaoY. ChenJ. ColemanL. CunqueiroT. DaiL. DuR. EhlersH. ElfnerD. EverettW. FanR. FriesC. GaleF. GarzaY. HeM. HeffernanU. HeinzB. V. JacakP. M. JacobsS. JeonW. KeE. KhalajB. KimM. Kordell IIA. KumarD. LiyanageT. LuoM. LuzumA. MajumderM. McNelisJ. MulliganC. NattrassD. OliinychenkoL. G. PangJ. -F. PaquetJ. H. PutschkeG. RolandB. SchenkeL. SchwiebertC. ShenA. SilvaC. SirimannaR. A. SoltzY. TachibanaG. VujanovicX. -N. WangR. L. WolpertY. Xu
hep-exhep-phnucl-th
Open graphReviewsDiscussion

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access50 authors3 topics
Imported metadata coverageMissing code, dataset, citation and institution fields are tracked without dominating the paper.Details
Citations: 0Reviews: 0Saves: 0Code: not linkedDataset: not linkedInstitutions: 0

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Like0Dislike0Score 0

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Save to reading list0
Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

C. ParkA. AngeramiS. A. BassS. CaoY. ChenJ. ColemanL. CunqueiroT. DaiL. DuR. EhlersH. ElfnerD. EverettW. FanR. FriesC. GaleF. GarzaY. HeM. HeffernanU. HeinzB. V. JacakP. M. JacobsS. JeonW. KeE. KhalajB. KimM. Kordell IIA. KumarD. LiyanageT. LuoM. LuzumA. MajumderM. McNelisJ. MulliganC. NattrassD. OliinychenkoL. G. PangJ. -F. PaquetJ. H. PutschkeG. RolandB. SchenkeL. SchwiebertC. ShenA. SilvaC. SirimannaR. A. SoltzY. TachibanaG. VujanovicX. -N. WangR. L. WolpertY. Xu

Institutions

No institution affiliation has been imported for this paper yet.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form
Log in to review

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form
Log in to comment

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.