Paper detail

Constraints on $H^\pm$ parameter space in 2HDM at $\sqrt{s}=$ 8 TeV and $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV

This paper reflects the heavy Higgs scenario where the mass of charged Higgs is equal to or greater than 200 GeV. The CMS observed and expected values of upper limits on the product $σ_H^\pm BR(H^\pm \rightarrow tb^\mp)$, assuming $H^\pm \rightarrow tb^\mp=1$, both at 8 TeV (at integrated luminosity of 19.7 $fb^{-1}$ ) and 13 TeV (at integrated luminosity of 35.9 $fb^{-1}$ ) c.m energies are used. By comparing these expected and observed upper limits with computational values , we find out the expected and observed exclusion regions of charged Higgs parameter space ($ m_H^\pm - tanβ$ space ) in 2HDM both at $\sqrt{s}=$8 and $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV. We compare the expected and observed exclusion regions and observe that exclusion regions made by observed upper limits are always greater than the exclusion made by expected upper limits both at 8 and 13 TeV c.m energies. Only in the mass range from 200 GeV to 220 GeV the expected exclusion region is greater than the observed one only at $\sqrt{s}=$13 TeV. We also equate the exclusion regions at these two different center of mass energies and find that the expected exclusion region and observed exclusion region at $\sqrt{s}=$13 TeV are always greater than the expected exclusion region and observed exclusion region at $\sqrt{S}=$8 TeV respectively.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.