Paper detail

Constraints on galileons from the positions of supermassive black holes

Galileons are scalar field theories which obey the Galileon symmetry $φ\to φ+ b + c_μx^μ$ and are capable of self-acceleration if they have an inverted sign for the kinetic term. These theories violate the Strong Equivalence Principle, such that black holes (BHs) do not couple to the Galileon field, whereas non-relativistic objects experience a fifth force with strength $ΔG / G_{\rm N}$ relative to gravity. For galaxies falling down a gradient in the Galileon field, this results in an offset between the centre of the galaxy and its host supermassive BH. We reconstruct the local gravitational and Galileon fields through a suite of constrained N-body simulations (which we dub CSiBORG) and develop a Monte Carlo-based forward model for these offsets on a galaxy-by-galaxy basis. Using the measured offset between the optical centre and active galactic nucleus of 1916 galaxies from the literature, propagating uncertainties in the input quantities and marginalising over an empirical noise model describing astrophysical and observational noise, we constrain the Galileon coupling to be $ΔG / G_{\rm N} < 0.16$ at $1σ$ confidence for Galileons with crossover scale $r_{\rm C} \gtrsim H_0^{-1}$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.