Paper detail

Constraints on $f(R_{ijkl}R^{ijkl})$ gravity: An evidence against the covariant resolution of the Pioneer anomaly

We consider corrections in the form of $ΔL(R_{ijkl}R^{ijkl})$ to the Einstein-Hilbert Lagrangian. Then we compute the corrections to the Schwarszchild geometry due to the inclusion of this general term to the Lagrangian. We show that $ΔL_3=α_{1/3}(R_{ijkl}R^{ijkl})^{1/3}$ gives rise to a constant anomalous acceleration for objects orbiting the Sun onward the Sun. This leads to the conclusion that $α_{1/3}=(13.91\pm 2.11) \times 10^{-26}(\frac{1}{\text{meters}})^{2/3}$ would have covariantly resolved the Pioneer anomaly if this value of $α_{1/3}$ had not contradicted other observations. We notice that the experimental bounds on $ΔL_3$ grows stronger in case we examine the deformation of the space-time geometry around objects lighter than the Sun. We therefore use the high precision measurements around the Earth (LAGEOS and LLR) and obtain a very strong constraint on the corrections in the form of $ΔL(R_{ijkl}R^{ijkl})$ and in particular $ΔL=α_n(R_{ijkl}R^{ijkl})^n$. This bound requires $α_{1/3}\leq6.12\times 10^{-29}(\frac{1}{\text{meters}})^{2/3}$. Therefore it refutes the covariant resolution of the Pioneer anomaly.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.