Paper detail

Constraints on exclusive branching fractions $BF_i(B^+\to X_c^il^+ν)$ from moment measurements in inclusive $B\to X_clν$ decays

As an alternative to direct measurements, we extract exclusive branching fractions of semileptonic B-meson decays to charmed mesons, $BF_i(B\to X_c^ilν)$ with $X_c^i = D, D^*, D_0, D'_1, D_1, D_2, D', D'^*$ and non-resonant final states $(D^{(*)}π)_{nr}$, from a fit to electron energy, hadronic mass and combined hadronic mass-energy moments measured in inclusive $B\to X_clν$ decays. The fit is performed by constraining the sum of exclusive branching fractions to the measured value of $BF(B\to X_clν)$, and with different sets of additional constraining terms for the directly measured branching fractions. There is no fit scenario in which a single branching fraction alone is enhanced to close the gap between $BF(B\to X_clν)$ and the sum of known branching fractions $BF_i(B\to X_c^ilν)$. The fitted $BF(B\to D^*lν)$ is 5% to 10% larger than the direct measurement depending on whether or not $BF(B\to D^*lν)$ is constrained to its direct measurement. $BF(B\to Dlν)$ values are in good agreement with the direct measurement unless $BF(B\to D^*lν)$ is constrained, which results in a higher $BF(B\to Dlν)$ value. Within large uncertainties, $BF(B\to D'_1lν)$ agrees with direct measurements. Depending on the fit scenario, $BF(B\to D_0lν)$ is consistent with or larger than its direct measurement. The fit is not able to easily disentangle $B\to D_1lν$ and $B\to D_2lν$, and tends to increase the sum of these two branching fractions. $BF(B\to (D^{(*)}π)_{nr}lν)$ with non-resonant $(D^{(*)}π)_{nr}$ final states is found to be 0.2-0.4%, consistent with $B\to D^{(*)}πlν$ and $B\to D^{**}(D^{(*)}π)lν$ measurements. No indication is found for significant contributions from so far unmeasured $B\to D'^{(*)}lν$ decays assuming that the $D'$ and $D'^*$ can be identified with the observed $D(2550)$, respectively, $D^*(2600)$ state.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.