Paper detail

Constraints on Cosmological Anisotropy out to z=1 from Supernovae Ia

A combined sample of 79 high and low redshift supernovae Ia (SNe) is used to set constraints on the degree of anisotropy in the Universe out to $z\simeq1$. First we derive the global most probable values of matter density $Ω_M $, the cosmological constant $Ω_Λ$, and the Hubble constant $H_0$, and find them to be consistent with the published results from the two data sets of Riess et al. 1998 (R98) and Perlmutter et al. 1999 (P99). We then examine the Hubble diagram (HD, i.e., the luminosity-redshift relation) in different directions on the sky by utilising spherical harmonic expansion. In particular, via the analysis of the dipole anisotropy, we divide the sky into the two hemispheres that yield the most discrepant of the three cosmological parameters, and the scatter $χ^2_{\rm HD}$ in each case. The most discrepant values roughly move along the locus $-4Ω_M +3 Ω_Λ = 1$ (cf. P99), but by no more than $Δ\approx 2.5$ along this line. For a perfect FRW universe, Monte Carlo realizations that mimic the current set of SNe yield values higher than the measured $Δ$ in $\sim 1/5$ of the cases. We discuss implications for the validity of the Cosmological Principle, and possible calibration problems in the SNe data sets.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.