Paper detail

Constraints on CEMP-no progenitors from nuclear astrophysics

The CEMP-no stars are long-lived small mass stars presenting a very low iron content and overabundances of carbon with no sign or only very weak signs for the presence of s- or r-elements. Although the origin of that abundance pattern is still a matter of debate, it was very likely inherited from a previous massive star, that we shall call here the source star. We rely on a recent classification of CEMP-no stars arguing that some of them are made of a material processed by hydrogen burning that was enriched in products of helium burning during the nuclear life of the source star. We examine the possibility of forming CEMP-no stars with this material. We study the nucleosynthesis of the CNO cycle and the Ne-Na Mg-Al chains in a hydrogen burning single zone while injecting the helium burning products $^{12}$C, $^{16}$O, $^{22}$Ne and $^{26}$Mg. We investigate the impact of changing the density and temperature, as well as the injection rate. The nuclear reaction rates involving the creation and destruction of $^{27}$Al are also examined. $^{14}$N, $^{23}$Na, $^{24}$Mg and $^{27}$Al are formed when injecting $^{12}$C, $^{16}$O, $^{22}$Ne and $^{26}$Mg in the hydrogen burning zone. The $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C ratio is constant under various conditions in the hydrogen burning zone. The predicted [Al/Fe] ratio varies up to $\sim 2$ dex depending on the prescription used for the reaction rates involving $^{27}$Al. The experiments we carried out support the view that some CEMP-no stars are made of a material processed by hydrogen burning, coming from a massive star experiencing mild-to-strong rotational mixing. During its burning, this material was likely enriched in helium burning products. No material coming from the carbon-oxygen rich core of the source star should be added to form the daughter star, otherwise the $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C ratio would be largely above the observed range of values.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.