Paper detail

Constraints on CDM cosmology from galaxy power spectrum, CMB and SNIa evolution

We examine the constraints that can be obtained on standard cold dark matter models from the most currently used data set: CMB anisotropies, type Ia supernovae and the SDSS luminous red galaxies. We also examine how these constraints are widened when the equation of state parameter $w$ and the curvature parameter $Ω_k$ are left as free parameters. For the $Λ$CDM model, our 'vanilla' model, cosmological parameters are tightly constrained and consistent with current estimates from various methods. When the dark energy parameter $w$ is free we find that the constraints remain mostly unchanged, i.e. changes are smaller than the 1 sigma uncertainties. Similarly, relaxing the assumption of a flat universe leads to nearly identical constraints on the dark energy density parameter of the universe $Ω_Λ$, baryon density of the universe $Ω_b $, the optical depth $τ$, the index of the power spectrum of primordial fluctuations $n_S$, with most one sigma uncertainties better than 5%. More significant changes appear on other parameters: while preferred values are almost unchanged, uncertainties for the physical dark matter density $Ω_ch^2$, Hubble constant $H_0$ and $σ_8$ are typically twice as large. We found that different methodological approaches on large scale structure estimates lead to appreciable differences in preferred values and uncertainty widths. We also found that possible evolution in SNIa intrinsic luminosity does not alter these constraints by much, except for $w$, for which the uncertainty is twice as large. At the same time, this possible evolution is severely constrained. We conclude that systematic uncertainties for some estimated quantities are similar or larger than statistical ones.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.