Paper detail

Constraints on a planetary origin for the gap in GM Aurigae's protoplanetary disc

The unusual spectral energy distribution (SED) of the classical T Tauri star GM Aurigae provides evidence for the presence of an inner disc hole extending to several au. Using a combination of hydrodynamical simulations and Monte Carlo radiative transport, we investigate whether the observed SED is consistent with the inner hole being created and maintained by an orbiting planet. We show that an ~ 2 M_Jupiter planet, orbiting at 2.5 au in a disc with mass 0.047 M_sun and radius 300 au, provides a good match both to the SED and to CO observations which constrain the velocity field in the disc. A range of planet masses is allowed by current data, but could in principle be distinguished with further observations between 3 and ~ 20 microns. Future high precision astrometric instruments should also be able to detect the motion of the central star due to an orbiting Jupiter mass planet. We argue that the small number of T Tauri stars with SEDs resembling that of GM Aur is broadly consistent with the expected statistics of embedded migrating planets.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.