Paper detail

Constraints on a fine-grained AdS/CFT correspondence

For a boundary CFT to give a good approximation to the bulk flat-space S-matrix, a number of conditions need to be satisfied: some of those are investigated here. In particular, one would like to identify an appropriate set of approximate asymptotic scattering states, constructed purely via boundary data. We overview, elaborate, and simplify obstacles encountered with existing proposals for these. Those corresponding to normalizable wavefunctions undergo multiple interactions; we contrast this situation with that needed for a flat-space LSZ treatment. Non-normalizable wavefunctions can have spurious interactions, due either to power-law tails of wavepackets or to their non-normalizable behavior, which obscure S-matrix amplitudes we wish to extract; although in the latter case we show that such gravitational interactions can be finite, as a result of gravitational red shift. We outline an illustrative construction of arbitrary normalizable wavepackets from boundary data, that also yields such spurious interactions. Another set of non-trivial questions regard the form of unitarity relations for the bulk S-matrix, and in particular its normalization and multi-particle cuts. These combined constraints, together with those found earlier on boundary singularity structure needed for bulk momentum conservation and other physical/analytic properties, are a non-trivial collection of obstacles to surmount if a fine-grained S-matrix, as opposed to a coarse-grained construction, is to be defined purely from boundary data.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.