Paper detail

Constraints of relic gravitational waves by Pulsar Timing Array: Forecasts for the FAST and SKA projects

Measurement of the pulsar timing residuals provides a direct way to detect relic gravitational waves at the frequency $f\sim 1/{\rm yr}$. In this paper, we investigate the constraints on the inflationary parameters, the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$ and the tensor spectral index $n_t$, by the current and future Pulsar Timing Arrays (PTAs). We find that Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope (FAST) in China and the planned Square Kilometer Array (SKA) projects have the fairly strong abilities to test the phantom-like inflationary models. If $r=0.1$, FAST could give the constraint on the spectral index $n_t<0.56$, and SKA gives $n_t<0.32$. While an observation with the total time T=20 yr, the pulsar noise level $σ_w=30$ns and the monitored pulsar number $n=200$, could even constrain $n_t<0.07$. These are much tighter than those inferred from the current results of Parkers Pulsar Timing Array (PPTA), European Pulsar Timing Array (EPTA) and North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational waves (NANOGrav). Especially, by studying the effects of various observational factors on the sensitivities of PTAs, we found that compared with $σ_w$ and $n$, the total observation time $T$ has the most significant effect.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.