Paper detail

Constraints from growth-rate data on some coupled dark energy models mimicking a $ΛCDM$ expansion

The $ΛCDM$ expansion could be mimicked by a dark energy coupled to matter. Then, the equation of state $\bar w$ and coupling $\bar Q$ of this coupled dark energy could not be constrained by observations of the Hubble function alone. Also, in this paper, we determine the constraints on two such coupled dark energy models considering some current and forecast Euclid-like growth-rate data and assuming the prior on the $ΛCDM$ dark matter density parameter today $Ω_{m0}=0.295\pm 0.04$. The first model is defined by a constant equation of state. We find that at $2σ$, $\bar w=-1.02_{-0.22}^{+0.06}$ and the coupling function $\bar Q_0$ today is $\bar Q_0H_0^{-3}=0.057_{-0.148}^{+0.353}$ with $H_0$ the Hubble constant. The second model is defined by a varying equation of state $\bar w=\bar w_a-\bar w_b\ln(1+z)$, with $z$ the redshift and $(\bar w_a,\bar w_b)$, two constants. We find that at $2σ$, $\bar w_a=-0.99_{-0.90}^{+0.17}$, $\bar w_b=-0.04_{-1.17}^{+0.31}$ and $\bar Q_0H_0^{-3}=0.0002_{-0.18}^{+1.35}$. These constraints on coupled dark energy agreed with a $ΛCDM$ model but are too poor to discard confidently a coupled dark energy different from vacuum but mimicking a $ΛCDM$ expansion.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.