Paper detail

Constraints from compact star observations on non-Newtonian gravity in strange stars based on a density dependent quark mass model

Using a density dependent quark mass (QMDD) model for strange quark matter, we investigate the effects of non-Newtonian gravity on the properties of strange stars and constrain the parameters of the QMDD model by employing the mass of PSR J0740+6620 and the tidal deformability of GW170817. We find that for QMDD model these mass and tidal deformability observations would rule out the existenceof str ange stars if non-Newtonian gravity effects are ignored. For the current quark masses of $m_{u0}=2.16$ MeV, $m_{d0}=4.67$ MeV, and $m_{s0}=93$ MeV, we find that a strange star can exist for values of the non-Newtonian gravity parameter $g^{2}/μ^{2}$ in the range of 4.58 GeV$^{-2}\leq g^{2}/μ^{2}\leq$ 9.32 GeV$^{-2}$, and that the parameters $D$ and $C$ of the QMDD modelare restricted to 158.3 MeV$\leq D^{1/2}\leq$ 181.2 MeV and $-0.65\leq C \leq -0.12$. It is found that the largest possible maximum mass of a strange star obtained with the QMDD model is $2.42 \, M_{\odot}$, and that the secondary componentof GW190814 with a mass of 2.59_{-0.09}^{+0.08}\, M_{\dot} could not be a static strange star. We also find that forthe mass and radius of PSR J0030+0451 given by Riley et al. through the analysis of observational data of NICER, there exists a very tiny allowed parameter space for which strange stars computed for the QMDD model agree with the observations of PSR J0740+6620, GW17 0817 and PSR J0030+0451 simultaneously. However, for the mass and radius given by Miller et al., no such parameter space exist.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.