Paper detail

Constraints for precise and accurate fluid inclusion stable isotope analysis using water-vapour saturated CRDS techniques

Hydrogen ($δ$2H) and oxygen ($δ$18O) isotopes of water extracted from speleothem fluid inclusions are important proxies used for paleoclimate reconstruction. In our study we use a cavity ring-down laser spectroscopy system for analysis and modified the approach of Affolter et al. (2014) for sample extraction. The method is based on crushing of small sub-gram speleothem samples in a heated and continuously water-vapour purged extraction line. The following points were identified: Injection of reference water shows a precision (1$σ$) of 0.4-0.5 permil for $δ$18O values and 1.1-1.9 permil for $δ$2H values for water amounts of 0.1-0.5 $μ$l, which improves with increasing water amount to 0.1-0.3 permil and 0.2-0.7 permil, respectively, above 1 $μ$l. The accuracy of measurements of water injections and water-filled glass capillaries crushed in the system is better than 0.08 permil for $δ$18O and 0.3 permil for $δ$2H values. The reproducibility (1$σ$) based on replicate analysis of speleothem fluid inclusion samples with water amounts > 0.2 $μ$l is 0.5 permil for $δ$18O and 1.2 permil for $δ$2H values, respectively. Isotopic differences between the water vapour background of the extraction system and the fluid inclusions have no significant impact on the measured fluid inclusion isotope values if they are within 10 permil for $δ$18O and 50 permil for $δ$2H values of the background. Tests of potential adsorption effects with inclusion free spar calcite confirm that the isotope values are unaffected by adsorption for water contents of about 1 $μ$l (fluid inclusion) water per g of carbonate or above. Fluid inclusion analysis on three different modern to late Holocene speleothems from caves in northwest Germany resulted ...

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.