Paper detail

Constraint on the ejecta mass for a black hole-neutron star merger event candidate S190814bv

We derive the upper limit to the ejecta mass of S190814bv, a black hole-neutron star merger candidate, through the radiative transfer simulations for kilonovae with the realistic ejecta density profile as well as the detailed opacity and heating rate models. The limits to the ejecta mass strongly depend on the viewing angle. For the face-on observations ($\le45^\circ$), the total ejecta mass should be smaller than $0.1\,M_\odot$ for the average distance of S190814bv ($D=267$ Mpc), while larger mass is allowed for the edge-on observations. We also derive the conservative upper limits of the dynamical ejecta mass to be $0.02\,M_\odot$, $0.03\,M_\odot$, and $0.05\,M_\odot$ for the viewing angle $\le 20^\circ$, $\le 50^\circ$, and for $\le 90^\circ$, respectively. We show that the {\it iz}-band observation deeper than $22$ mag within 2 d after the GW trigger is crucial to detect the kilonova with the total ejecta mass of $0.06\,M_\odot$ at the distance of $D=300$ Mpc. We also show that a strong constraint on the NS mass-radius relation can be obtained if the future observations put the upper limit of $0.03\,M_\odot$ to the dynamical ejecta mass for a BH-NS event with the chirp mass smaller than $\lesssim 3\,M_\odot$ and effective spin larger than $\gtrsim 0.5$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.