Paper detail

Constraint on $f(R)$ Gravity through the Redshift Space Distortion

In this paper, a specific family of $f(R)$ models that can produce the $Λ$CDM background expansion history is constrained by using the currently available geometric and dynamic probes. The scale dependence of the growth rate $f(z,k)$ in this specific family of $f(R)$ model is shown. Therefore to eliminate the scale dependence of $fσ_8(z)$ in theory, which usually is defined as the product of $f(z,k)$ and $σ_8(z)$, we define $fσ_8(z)=dσ_8(z)/d\ln a$ which is obviously scale independent and reproduces the conventional definition in the standard $Λ$CDM cosmology. In doing so, under the assumption that future probes having the same best fit values as the current ten data points of $fσ_8(z)$, even having $20\%$ error bars enlarged, we find a preliminary constraint $f_{R0}=-2.58_{-0.58}^{+2.14}\times 10^{-6}$ in $1σ$ regions. This indicates the great potential that redshift space distortions have in constraining modified gravity theories. We also discuss the nonlinear matter power spectrum based on different halo fit models.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.