Paper detail

Constraining turbulence and conduction in the hot ICM through density perturbations

Using 3D high-resolution hydrodynamic simulations, tracking both electrons and ions, we study the effects of turbulence and conduction in the hot intracluster medium. We show how the power spectrum of the gas density perturbations can accurately constrain both processes. The characteristic amplitude of density perturbations is linearly related to the strength of turbulence, i.e. the 3D Mach number, as A(k)_max = 0.25 M. The slope of A(k) in turn reflects the level of conduction. In a non-conductive medium, subsonic stirring motions advect density with a similar nearly Kolmogorov cascade. Increasing conduction (via magnetic suppression f = 0.001-1) progressively steepens the spectrum towards the Burgers-like regime. The turbulent Prandtl number defines the dynamic similarity of the flow; at scales where Pt < 100, the spectrum develops a significant decay. The transition is gentle for highly suppressed conduction, f < 0.001, while sharp in the opposite regime. For strong conductivity (f > 0.1), Pt ~ 100 occurs on spatial scales larger than the injection scale. The velocity spectrum is instead not much affected by conduction. The f > 0.1 regime affects the appearance of X-ray images, in which Kelvin-Helmholtz and Rayleigh-Taylor rolls and filaments are washed out. In a stratified system, weak/strong turbulence induces higher isobaric/adiabatic fluctuations, while conduction forces both modes towards the intermediate isothermal regime. We provide a general analytic fit which is applied to new deep Chandra observations of Coma. The observed spectrum is best consistent with strongly suppressed effective isotropic conduction, f = 0.001, and mild subsonic turbulence, M = 0.45 (with injection at ~250 kpc). The low conductivity corroborates the survival of sharp features in the ICM (cold fronts, filaments, bubbles), and indicates that cooling flows may not be balanced by conduction.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.