Paper detail

Constraining topological defects with temperature and polarization anisotropies

We analyse the possible contribution of topological defects to cosmic microwave anisotropies, both temperature and polarisation. We allow for the presence of both inflationary scalars and tensors, and of polarised dust foregrounds that may contribute to or dominate the B-mode polarisation signal. We confirm and quantify our previous statements that topological defects on their own are a poor fit to the B-mode signal. However, adding topological defects to a models with a tensor component or a dust component improves the fit around $\ell=200$. Fitting simultaneously to both temperature and polarisation data, we find that textures fit almost as well as tensors ($Δχ^2 = 2.0$), while Abelian Higgs strings are ruled out as the sole source of the B-mode signal at low $\ell$. The 95% confidence upper limits on models combining defects and dust are $Gμ< 2.7\times 10^{-7}$ (Abelian Higgs strings), $Gμ< 9.8\times 10^{-7}$ (semilocal strings) and $Gμ< 7.3\times 10^{-7}$ (textures), a small reduction on the $Planck$ bounds. The most economical fit overall is obtained by the standard $Λ$CDM model with a polarised dust component.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.