Paper detail

Constraining thermal dust emission in distant galaxies with number counts and angular power spectra

We perform a joint fit to differential number counts from Spitzer's MIPS and Herschel's SPIRE instruments, and angular power spectra of cosmic infrared background (CIB) anisotropies from SPIRE, Planck, the Atacama Cosmology Telescope, and the South Pole Telescope, which together span 220 < ν/ GHz < 4300 (70 < λ/ μm < 1400). We simultaneously constrain the dust luminosity function, thermal dust spectral energy distribution (SED) and clustering properties of CIB sources, and the evolution of these quantities over cosmic time. We find that the data strongly require redshift evolution in the thermal dust SED. In our adopted parametrization, this evolution takes the form of an increase in graybody dust temperature at high redshift, but it may also be related to a temperature - dust luminosity correlation or evolution in dust opacity. The counts and spectra together constrain the evolution of the thermal dust luminosity function up to z ~ 2.5-3, complementing approaches relying on rest-frame mid-infrared observations of the rarest bright objects. We are able to fit the power spectra without requiring a complex halo model approach, and show that neglecting scale-dependent halo bias may be impairing analyses that do use this framework.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.