Paper detail

Constraining the surface properties of Helene

We analyze two sets of observations of Dione's co-orbital satellite Helene taken by Cassini's Composite Infrared Spectrometer (CIRS). The first observation was a CIRS FP3 (600 to 1100cm-1, 9.1 to 16.7 $μ$m) stare of Helene's trailing hemisphere, where two of the ten FP3 pixels were filled. The daytime surface temperatures derived from these observations were 83.3${\pm}$0.9 K and 88.8${\pm}$0.8 K at local times 223$°$ to 288$°$ and 180$°$ to 238$°$ respectively. When these temperatures were compared to a 1-D thermophysical model only albedos between 0.25 and 0.70 were able to fit the data, with a mean and standard deviation of 0.43${\pm}$0.12. All thermal inertias tested between 1 and 2000 J m$^{-2}$ K$^{-1}$ s$^{-1/2}$ could fit the data (i.e. thermal inertia was not constrained). The second observation analyzed was a FP3 and FP4 (1100 to 1400cm-1, 7.1 to 9.1 $μm)$ scan of Helene's leading hemisphere. Temperatures between 77 and 89 K were observed with FP3, with a typical error between 5 and 10 K. The surface temperatures derived from FP4 were higher, between 98 and 106 K, but with much larger errors (between 10 and 30 K) and thus the FP3- and FP4-derived temperature largely agree within their uncertainty. Dione's disk-integrated bolometric Bond albedos have been found to be between 0.63${\pm}$0.15 (Howett et al., 2010) and 0.44${\pm}$0.13 (Howett et al., 2014). Thus Helene may be darker than Dione, which is the opposite of the trend found at shorter wavelengths (c.f. Hedman et al., 2020; Royer et al., 2020). However few conclusions can be drawn since the albedos of Dione and Helene agree within their uncertainty.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.