Paper detail

Constraining the size of the Comptonizing medium by modeling the energy dependent time-lags of kHz QPOs of Neutron star system

In earlier works, we had shown that the observed soft lags and r.m.s versus energy of the lower kHz QPO of neutron star binaries can be explained in the framework of a thermal Comptonization model. It was also shown that such an interpretation can provide estimates of the size and geometry of the Comptonizing medium. Here we study the dependence of these estimates on the time-averaged spectral model assumed and on the frequency of the QPO. We use the high quality time lag and r.m.s obtained during March 3rd 1996 observation of 4U 1608-52 by RXTE as well as other observations of the source at different QPO frequencies where a single time-lag between two broad energy bands have been reported. We compare the results obtained when assuming that the time-averaged spectra are represented by the spectrally degenerate "hot" and "cold" seed photon spectral models. We find that for the "hot" seed photon model the medium size is in the range of 0.3-2.0 kms and the size decreases with increasing QPO frequency. On the other hand for the "cold" seed photon model the range for the sizes are much larger 0.5-20 kms and hence perhaps show no variation with QPO frequency. Our results emphasis the need for broad band spectral information combined with high frequency timing to lift this degeneracy. We further show that the r.m.s as a function of energy for the upper kHz QPO is similar to the lower one and indeed we find that the driver for this QPO should be temperature variations of the corona identical to the lower kHz QPO. However, the time lag reported for the upper kHz QPO is hard, which if confirmed, would challenge the simple Comptonization model presented here. It would perhaps imply that reverberation lags are also important and/or the dominate spectral component is not a single temperature medium but a multi-temperature complex one.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.