Paper detail

Constraining the role of novae as progenitors of Type Ia Supernovae

(Abridged) White dwarfs (WDs) undergoing unstable nuclear burning on their surfaces, resulting in the nova phenomenon, have been considered as one of the prospective candidates for the still elusive progenitors of SNeIa. We propose that statistics of novae in nearby galaxies may be a powerful tool to gauge the role of such systems in producing SNeIa. Using multicycle nova evolutionary models, we compute the number and temporal distribution of novae that would be produced by a typical (unstably burning) SNIa progenitor before reaching the Chandrasekhar mass limit (M_ch) and exploding. Combined with the observed nova rates, this can be used to constrain the maximal contribution of the nova channel to the SNIa rate in nearby galaxies. The M31 nova rate measured by the POINT-AGAPE survey is 65/yr. Assuming that all these novae will reach M_ch, we obtain the maximal SNIa rate novae may produce to be (1-5)x10^-4/yr. This constrains the overall contribution of the nova channel to the SNIa rate in M31 at <2-7%. Furthermore, ~80% of novae generated by a successful SNIa progenitor have short decay times (t2<10 days), and are produced when the WD mass is close to M_ch. We point out that statistics of such fast novae can provide a sensitive diagnostic of the contribution of the nova channel to the final stages of mass accumulation by the single degenerate (SD) SNIa progenitors. To explore the prospects of their use, we investigate the efficiency of detecting fast novae in an M31 nova survey of the PTF class. We find that a survey with limiting magnitude of m_R~22 observing at least every 2nd night will catch ~90% of fast novae expected in the SD scenario. Such surveys should be detecting fast novae in M31 at a rate of the order of >10^3xf per yr, where f is the fraction of SNeIa which accreted in the unstable nuclear burning regime while accumulating the final ~0.1M_sun before the SNIa explosion.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.