Paper detail

Constraining the reionization and thermal history of the Universe using a semi-numerical photon-conserving code SCRIPT

Given that the reionization history of cosmic hydrogen is yet to be stringently constrained, it is worth checking the prospects of doing so using physically motivated models and available observational data. For this purpose, we use an extended version of the explicitly photon-conserving semi-numerical model of reionization, $\texttt{SCRIPT}$, which also includes thermal evolution of the intergalactic medium (IGM). The model incorporates the effects of inhomogeneous recombination and radiative feedback self-consistently and is characterized by five free parameters (two for the redshift-dependent ionization efficiency, two for the ionizing escape fraction, and another for reionization temperature increment). We constrain these free parameters by simultaneously matching with various observational probes, e.g., estimates of the ionized hydrogen fraction, the CMB scattering optical depth and the galaxy UV luminosity function. In addition, we include the low-density IGM temperature measurements obtained from Lyman-$α$ absorption spectra at $z \sim 5.5$, a probe not commonly used for Bayesian analysis of reionization parameters. We find that the interplay of the various data sets, particularly inclusion of the temperature data, leads to tightening of the parameter constraints. Our default models prefer a late end of reionization (at $z \lesssim 6$), in agreement with other recent studies. We can also derive constraints on the duration of reionization, $Δz=1.81^{+0.51}_{-0.67}$ and the midpoint of reionization, $z_{\mathrm{mid}}=7.0^{+0.30}_{-0.40}$. The constraints can be further tightened by including other available and upcoming data sets.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.