Paper detail

Constraining the Rate of Relativistic Jets from Tidal Disruptions Using Radio Surveys

Tidal disruption of stars by massive black holes produce transient accretion flows that flare at optical, UV, and X-ray wavelengths. At late times, these accretion flows may launch relativistic jets that can be detected through the interaction of the jet with the dense interstellar medium of the galaxy. We present an upper limit for the flux density of a radio counterpart to a tidal disruption event detected by GALEX that is a factor of 6 below theoretical predictions. We also examine existing radio surveys for transients with a time scale of 1 year and use these to set a $2 σ$ upper limit on the rate of tidal disruption events producing relativistic jets of ~14 x 10^-7 Mpc^-3 y^-1. This rate is an order of magnitude lower than the highest values from theoretical models and is consistent with detection rates from optical and X-ray surveys.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.