Paper detail

Constraining the Quasar Contribution to the Reionisation of Cosmic Hydrogen

Absorption spectra of high redshift quasars suggest that the reionisation of cosmic hydrogen was complete near z~6. The dominant sources of ionising photons responsible for this reionisation are generally thought to be stars and quasars. In this paper we make a quantitative estimate of the relative contributions made by these sources. Our approach is to compute the evolution of the post overlap ionising background radiation by combining semi-analytic descriptions of reionisation in a clumpy medium with a model for the quasar luminosity function. Our overall model has two free parameters, the star formation efficiency and the minimum quasar luminosity. By adjusting these parameters, we constrain the relative contributions made by stars and quasars through comparison with reported observations (Fan et al. 2005). We find that the relative quasar contribution (at z=5.7) to the ionising background was between 1.4% and 14.5%. The range of uncertainty is dominated by the unknown minimum quasar luminosity.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.