Paper detail

Constraining the parameters of GW150914 & GW170104 with numerical relativity surrogates

Gravitational-wave detectors have begun to observe coalescences of heavy black holes at a consistent pace for the past few years. Accurate models of gravitational waveforms are essential for unbiased and precise estimation of source parameters. Recently developed surrogate models based on high-accuracy numerical relativity (NR) simulations are ideal for constraining physical parameters of heavy black hole merger events. In this paper, we first demonstrate the viability of these multi-modal surrogates as reliable parameter estimation tools. We show that NR surrogates can extract additional information from GW data that is inaccessible to traditional models, by analyzing a set of synthetic signals with the NR surrogate and other approximants. We also consider the case of two of the earliest binary black holes detected by the LIGO observatories: GW150914 and GW170104. We reanalyze their data with fully-precessing NR-surrogate templates and freely provide the resulting posterior samples as supplemental material. We find that our refined analysis is able to extract information from sub-dominant GW harmonics in data, and therefore better resolve the degeneracy in measuring source luminosity distance and orbital inclination for both events. We estimate the sources of both events to be 20-25% further away than was previously estimated. Our analyses also constrain their orbital orientation more tightly around face-on or face-off configurations than before. Additionally, for GW150914 we constrain the effective inspiral spin more tightly around zero. This work is one of the first to unambiguously extract sub-dominant GW mode information from real events. It is also a first step toward eliminating the approximations used in semi-analytic waveform models from GW parameter estimation. It also motivates that NR surrogates be extended to cover more of the binary black hole parameter space.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.