Paper detail

Constraining the masses of planets in protoplanetary discs from the presence or absence of vortices -- Comparison with ALMA observations

A massive planet in a protoplanetary disc will open a gap in the disc material. A steep gap edge can be hydrodynamically unstable, which results in the formation of vortices that can act as tracers for the presence of planets in observational results. However, in a viscous disc, the potential formation of these vortices is dependent on the timescale over which the massive planet accretes mass and with a sufficiently long timescale it is possible for no vortices to form. Hence, there is a connection between the presence of vortices and the growth timescale of the planet and it may therefore be possible to exclude a planetary interpretation of observed structure from the absence of vortices. We have investigated the effect of the planet growth timescale on vortex formation for a range of planet masses and viscosities and have found an approximate relation between the planet mass, viscosity and planet growth timescale for which vortices are not formed within the disc. We then interpret these results in the light of recent observations. We have also found that planets do not need to be close to a Jupiter mass to form vortices in the disc if these discs have low viscosity, as these can be caused by planets as small as a few Neptune masses.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.