Paper detail

Constraining the masses of microlensing black holes and the mass gap with Gaia DR2

Context: Gravitational microlensing is sensitive to compact-object lenses in the Milky Way, including white dwarfs, neutron stars or black holes, and could potentially probe a wide range of stellar remnant masses. However, the mass of the lens can be determined only in very limited cases, due to missing information on both source and lens distances and their proper motions. Aims: We aim at improving the mass estimates in the annual parallax microlensing events found in the 8 years of OGLE-III observations towards the Galactic Bulge (Wyrzykowski et al. 2016) with the use of Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2). Methods: We use Gaia DR2 data on distances and proper motions of non-blended sources and recompute the masses of lenses in parallax events. We also identify new events in that sample which are likely to have dark lens; the total number of such events is now 18. Results: The derived distribution of masses of dark lenses is consistent with a continuous distribution of stellar remnant masses. A mass gap between neutron-star and black-hole masses in the range between 2 and 5 solar masses is not favoured by our data, unless black holes receive natal-kicks above 20-80 km/s. We present 8 candidates for objects with masses within the putative mass gap, including a spectacular multi-peak parallax event with mass of $2.4^{+1.9}_{-1.3}\ M_\odot$ located just at 600 pc. The absence of an observational mass gap between neutron stars and black holes, or, conversely, the evidence for black hole natal kicks if a mass gap is assumed, can inform future supernova modelling efforts.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.