Paper detail

Constraining the magnetic field structure in collisionless relativistic shocks with a radio afterglow polarization upper limit in GW170817

Gamma-ray burst afterglows arise from relativistic collisionless shocks in which the postshock tangled magnetic field $\vec{B}$ is produced by the two-stream and/or Weibel instabilities on plasma skin-depth scales $(c/ω_p)$. The field is expected to be oriented predominantly within the shock plane ($B_{\perp}$; transverse to the shock normal, $\hat{n}_{\rm{sh}}$), and is often approximated to be completely within it ($B_\parallel\equiv\hat{n}_{\rm{sh}}\,\cdot\,\vec{B}=0$). Current 2D/3D particle-in-cell simulations are limited to short timescales and box sizes $\lesssim10^4(c/ω_p)\ll R/Γ_{\rm{sh}}$ much smaller than the shocked region&#39;s comoving width, and cannot probe the asymptotic downstream $\vec{B}$ structure. We constrain the latter using the linear polarization upper limit, $|Π|<12\%$, on the radio afterglow of GW170817/GRB170817A. Afterglow polarization depends on the jet&#39;s angular structure, our viewing angle, and the $\vec{B}$ structure. In GW170817/GRB170817A the latter can be tightly constrained since the former two are constrained from observations. We model $\vec{B}$ as an isotropic field in 3D that is stretched along $\hat{n}_{\rm{sh}}$ by a factor $ξ\equiv{}B_{\parallel}/B_{\perp}$, whose initial value $ξ_f\equiv{}B_{\parallel,f}/B_{\perp,f}$ describes the field that survives downstream on plasma scales $\ll{}R/Γ_{\rm{sh}}$. We calculate $Π(ξ_f)$ by integrating over the shocked volume for core-dominated structured jets, with a local Blandford-McKee self-similar radial profile. We find that independent of the exact jet structure, $\vec{B}$ has a finite, but initially sub-dominant, parallel component: $0.57\lesssimξ_f\lesssim0.89$, making it less anisotropic. While this motivates numerical studies of the asymptotic $\vec{B}$ structure in relativistic collisionless shocks, it may be consistent with turbulence amplified magnetic field.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.