Paper detail

Constraining the ISM properties of the Cloverleaf quasar host galaxy with Herschel spectroscopy

We present Herschel observations of far-infrared (FIR) fine-structure (FS) lines [CII]158$μ$m, [OI]63$μ$m, [OIII]52$μ$m, and [SiII]35$μ$m in the z=2.56 Cloverleaf quasar, and combine them with published data in an analysis of the dense interstellar medium (ISM) in this system. Observed [CII]158$μ$m, [OI]63$μ$m, and FIR continuum flux ratios are reproduced with photodissociation region (PDR) models characterized by moderate far-ultraviolet (FUV) radiation fields $G_0=$ 0.3-1$\times10^3$ and atomic gas densities $n_{\rm H}=$ 3-5$\times10^3$ cm$^{-3}$, depending on contributions to [CII]158$μ$m from ionized gas. We assess the contribution to [CII]158$μ$m flux from an active galactic nucleus (AGN) narrow line region (NLR) using ground-based measurements of the [NII]122$μ$m transition, finding that the NLR can contribute at most 20-30% of the observed [CII]158$μ$m flux. The PDR density and far-UV radiation fields inferred from the atomic lines are not consistent with the CO emission, indicating that the molecular gas excitation is not solely provided via UV-heating from local star-formation, but requires an additional heating source. X-ray heating from the AGN is explored, and we find that X-ray dominated region (XDR) models, in combination with PDR models, can match the CO cooling without overproducing observed FS line emission. While this XDR/PDR solution is favored given the evidence for both X-rays and star-formation in the Cloverleaf, we also investigate alternatives for the warm molecular gas, finding that either mechanical heating via low-velocity shocks or an enhanced cosmic-ray ionization rate may also contribute. Finally, we include upper limits on two other measurements attempted in the Herschel program: [CII]158$μ$m in FSC~10214 and [OI]63$μ$m in APM~08279+5255.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.