Paper detail

Constraining the initial conditions of globular clusters using their radius distribution

Studies of extra-galactic globular clusters have shown that the peak size of the globular cluster (GC) radius distribution (RD) depends only weakly on galactic environment, and can be used as a standard ruler. We model RDs of GC populations using a simple prescription for a Hubble time of relaxation driven evolution of cluster mass and radius, and explore the conditions under which the RD can be used as a standard ruler. We consider a power-law cluster initial mass function (CIMF) with and without an exponential truncation, and focus in particular on a flat and a steep CIMF (power-law indices of 0 and -2, respectively). For the initial half-mass radii at birth we adopt either Roche-lobe filling conditions ('filling',meaning that the ratio of half-mass to Jacobi radius is approximately rh/rJ ~ 0.15) or strongly Roche-lobe under-filling conditions ('under-filling', implying that initially rh/rJ << 0.15). Assuming a constant orbital velocity about the galaxy centre we find for a steep CIMF that the typical half-light radius scales with galactocentric radius RG as RG^1/3. This weak scaling is consistent with observations, but this scenario has the (well known) problem that too many low-mass clusters survive. A flat CIMF with 'filling' initial conditions results in the correct mass function at old ages, but with too many large (massive) clusters at large RG. An 'underfilling' GC population with a flat CIMF also results in the correct mass function, and can also successfully reproduce the shape of the RD, with a peak size that is (almost) independent of RG. In this case, the peak size depends (almost) only on the peak mass of the GC mass function. The (near) universality of the GC RD is therefore because of the (near) universality of the CIMF. There are some extended GCs in the outer halo of the Milky Way that cannot be explained by this model.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.