Paper detail

Constraining the accretion flow density profile near Sgr A* using the $L'$-band emission of the S2 star

The density profile of the ambient medium around a supermassive black hole plays an important role in understanding the inflow-outflow mechanisms in the Galactic Centre. We constrain the spherical density profile using the stellar bow shock of the star S2 which orbits the supermassive black hole at the Galactic Centre with the pericentre distance of 14.4 mas ($\sim$ 1500 R$_\text{s}$). Assuming an elliptical orbit, we apply celestial mechanics and the theory of bow shocks that are at ram pressure equilibrium. We analyse the measured infrared flux density and magnitudes of S2 in the L'-band (3.8 micron) obtained over seven epochs in the years between 2004-2018. We detect no significant change in S2 flux density until the recent periapse in May 2018. The intrinsic flux variability of S2 is at the level of 2 - 3%. Based on the dust-extinction model, the upper limit on the number density at the S2 periapse is $\sim$1.87$\times$10$^9$ cm$^{-3}$, which yields a density slope of at most 3.20. Using the synchrotron bow-shock emission, we obtain an ambient density of $\leq$ 1.01$\times$10$^5$ cm$^{-3}$ and a slope of $\leq$ 1.47. These values are consistent with a wide variety of media from hot accretion flows to potentially colder and denser media comparable in properties to broad-line region clouds. A standard thin disc can be, however, excluded at the distance of the S2 pericentre. Based on our sensitivity of 0.01 mag, we can distinguish between hot accretion flows and thin, cold discs, where the latter can be excluded at the scale of the S2 periapse. Future observations of stars with smaller pericentre distances in the S cluster using instruments such as METIS@ELT with a photometric sensitivity of as much as 10$^{-3}$ mag will allow to probe the Galactic Centre medium at intermediate scales at densities as low as $\sim$ 700 cm$^{-3}$ in case of non-thermal bow-shock emission.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.