Paper detail

Constraining sub-Parsec Binary Supermassive Black Holes in Quasars with Multi-Epoch Spectroscopy. I. The General Quasar Population

We perform a systematic search for sub-parsec binary supermassive black holes (BHs) in normal broad line quasars at z<0.8, using multi-epoch SDSS spectroscopy of the broad Hbeta line. Our working model is that: only one of the two BHs in the binary is active, and dynamically dominates its own broad line region (BLR); the inactive companion BH is orbiting at a distance of a few R_BLR, where R_BLR~0.01-0.1 pc is the BLR size. We search for the expected line-of-sight acceleration of the broad line velocity from binary orbital motion by cross-correlating SDSS spectra from two epochs separated by up to several years in the quasar restframe. Out of ~700 pairs of spectra for which we have good measurements of the velocity shift between two epochs (1-sigma error~40 km/s), we detect 28 systems with significant velocity shifts in broad Hbeta, among which seven are the best candidates for the hypothesized binaries. We use the distribution of the observed accelerations (mostly non-detections) to place constraints on the abundance of such binary systems among the general quasar population. Excess variance in the velocity shift is inferred for observations separated by longer than 0.4 yr (quasar restframe). Attributing all the excess to binary motion would imply that most of the quasars in this sample must be in binaries; that the inactive BH must be on average more massive than the active one; and that the binary separation is at most a few times the size of the BLR. However, if this excess variance is partly or largely due to long-term broad line variability, the requirement of a large population of close binaries is much weakened or even disfavored for massive companions. [Abridged]

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.