Paper detail

Constraining structure formation using EDGES

The experiment to detect the global epoch of reionization signature (EDGES) collaboration reported the detection of a line at 78MHz in the sky-averaged spectrum due to neutral hydrogen (HI) 21-cm hyperfine absorption of cosmic microwave background photons at $z\sim 17$. This requires that the spin temperature of HI be coupled to the kinetic temperature of the gas at this $z$ through the scattering of Ly-$α$ photons emitted by massive stars. To explain the experimental result, star formation needs to be sufficiently efficient at $z\sim 17$ and this can be used to constrain models in which small-scale structure formation is suppressed (DMF models), either due to dark matter free-streaming or non-standard inflationary dynamics. We combine simulations of structure formation with a simple recipe for star formation to investigate whether these models emit enough Ly-$α$ photons to reproduce the experimental signal for reasonable values of the star formation efficiency, $f_\star$. We find that a thermal warm dark matter (WDM) model with mass $m_\mathrm{WDM}\sim 4.3\,\mathrm{keV}$ is consistent with the timing of the signal for $f_\star\lesssim 2\%$. The exponential growth of structure around $z\sim 17$ in such a model naturally generates a sharp onset of the absorption. A warmer model with $m_\mathrm{WDM}\sim 3\,\mathrm{keV}$ requires a higher star formation efficiency, $f_\star\sim 6\%$, which is a factor of few above predictions of current star formation models and observations of satellites in the Milky Way. However, uncertainties in the process of star formation at these $z$ do not allow to derive strong constrains on such models using 21-cm absorption line. The onset of the 21-cm absorption is generally faster in DMF compared to cold dark matter (CDM), unless some process significantly suppresses star formation in halos with masses below $\sim 10^8\,h^{-1}\,\mathrm{M}_\odot$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.