Paper detail

Constraining Stellar Feedback: Shock-ionized Gas in Nearby Starburst Galaxies

(abridged) We investigate the properties of feedback-driven shocks in 8 nearby starburst galaxies using narrow-band imaging data from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). We identify the shock--ionized component via the line diagnostic diagram \oiii/\hb vs. \sii (or \nii)/\ha, applied to resolved regions 3--15 pc in size. We divide our sample into three sub-samples: sub-solar (Holmberg II, NGC 1569, NGC 4214, NGC 4449, and NGC 5253), solar (He 2-10, NGC 3077) and super-solar (NGC 5236) for consistent shock measurements. For the sub-solar sub-sample, we derive three scaling relations: (1) $L_{shock} \propto {SFR}^{~0.62}$, (2) $L_{shock} \propto {Σ_{SFR,HL}}^{~0.92}$, and (3) $L_{shock}/L_{tot} \propto {(L_H/L_{\odot,H})}^{-0.65}$, where $L_{shock}$ is the \ha luminosity from shock--ionized gas, ${Σ_{SFR,HL}}$ the SFR per unit half-light area, $L_{tot}$ the total \ha luminosity, and $L_H/L_{\odot,H}$ the absolute H-band luminosity from 2MASS normalized to solar luminosity. The other two sub--samples do not have enough number statistics, but appear to follow the first scaling relation. The energy recovered indicates that the shocks from stellar feedback in our sample galaxies are fully radiative. If the scaling relations are applicable in general to stellar feedback, our results are similar to those by Hopkins et al. (2012) for galactic super winds. This similarity should, however, be taken with caution at this point, as the underlying physics that enables the transition from radiative shocks to gas outflows in galaxies is still poorly understood.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.