Paper detail

Constraining quasar structure using high-frequency microlensing variations and continuum reverberation

Gravitational microlensing is a powerful tool to probe the inner structure of strongly lensed quasars and to constrain parameters of the stellar mass function of lens galaxies. This is done by analysing microlensing light curves between the multiple images of strongly lensed quasars, under the influence of three main variable components: 1- the continuum flux of the source, 2- microlensing by stars in the lens galaxy and 3- reverberation of the continuum by the Broad Line Region (BLR). The latter, ignored by state-of-the-art microlensing techniques, can introduce high-frequency variations which we show carry information on the BLR size. We present a new method which includes all these components simultaneously and fits the power spectrum of the data in the Fourier space, rather than the observed light curve itself. In this new framework, we analyse COSMOGRAIL light curves of the two-image system QJ0158-4325 known to display high-frequency variations. Using exclusively the low frequency part of the power spectrum our constraint on the accretion disk radius agrees with the thin disk model estimate and previous work that fit the microlensing light curves in real space. However, if we also take into account the high-frequency variations, the data favour significantly smaller disk sizes than previous microlensing measurements. In this case, our results are in agreement with the thin disk model prediction only if we assume very low mean masses for the microlens population, i.e. <M> = 0.01 $M_\odot$. Eventually, including the differentially microlensed continuum reverberation by the BLR successfully explains the high frequencies without requiring such low mass microlenses. This allows us to measure, for the first time, the size of the BLR using single-band photometric monitoring, $R_{BLR}$ = $1.6^{+1.5}_{-0.8}\times 10^{17}$cm, in agreement with estimates using the BLR size-luminosity relation.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.