Paper detail

Constraining Quasar and IGM Properties Through Bubble Detection in Redshifted 21-cm Maps

The infrared detection of a z>7 quasar has opened up a new window to directly probe the IGM during the epoch of reionization. In this paper we theoretically consider the possibility of detecting the ionized bubble around a z=8 quasar using targeted redshifted 21-cm observations with the GMRT. The apparent shape and size of the ionized bubble, as seen by a distant observer, depends on the parameters \dot{N}_{phs}/C, x_HI/C and τ_Q where \dot{N}_{phs}, τ_Q, x_HI and C are respectively the photon emission rate, age of the quasar, the neutral fraction and clumping factor of the IGM.Here we have analytically estimated the shape and size of a quasar's ionized bubble assuming an uniform IGM and ignoring other ionizing sources besides the quasar, and used this as a template for matched filter bubble search with the GMRT visibility data. We have assumed that \dot{N}_{phs} is known from the infrared spectrum and C from theoretical considerations, which gives us two free parameters x_HI and τ_Q for bubble. Considering 1,000 hr of observation, we find that there is a reasonably large region of parameter space where a 3σdetection is possible. We also find that it will be possible to place lower limits on x_HI and τ_Q with this observation. Deeper follow up observations can place upper limits on τ_Q and x_HI. Value of C affect the estimation of x_HI but the estimation of τ_Q remains unaffected.We have used a semi-numerical technique to simulate the apparent shape and size of quasar ionized bubbles considering the presence of other ionizing sources and inhomogeneities in the IGM. The presence of other sources increase the size of the quasar bubble, leading to underestimation of x_HI. Clustering of other ionizing sources around the quasar can produce severe distortions in bubble's shape. However, this does not severely affect parameter estimation in the bubbles that are large.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.