Paper detail

Constraining physics of very hot super-Earths with the James Webb Telescope. The case of Corot-7b

Super-Earths with solid surfaces such CoRot-7b and Kepler-10b are expected to be extremely hot. It has been suggested that they must be atmosphere-free and that a lava ocean is present on their hot dayside. Here, we use several dedicated thermal models to study how observations with NIRSPEC on the JWST could further confirm and constrain, or reject the atmosphere-free lava ocean planet model for very hot super-Earths. Using CoRoT-7b as a working case, we explore the consequences on the phase-curve of a non tidal-locked rotation, with/without an atmosphere, and for different values of the albedo. We simulate future observations of the reflected light and thermal emission from CoRoT-7b with NIRSPEC-JWST and look for detectable signatures, such as time lag, as well as the possibility to retrieve the latitudinal surface temperature distribution. We demonstrate that we should be able to constrain several parameters after observations of two orbits (42 h) with a broad range of wavelengths: i)The Bond albedo is retrieved to within +/- 0.03 in most cases. ii) The lag effect allows us to retrieve the rotation period within 3 hours for a planet, with rotation half the orbital period. iii) Any spin period shorter than a limit in the range 30 - 800 h, depending on the thickness of the thermal layer in the soil, would be detected. iv) The presence of a thick gray atmosphere with a pressure of one bar, and a specific opacity higher than 1.0E-5 m-2 kg-1 is detectable. v) With spectra up to 4.5 mu, the latitudinal temperature profile can be retrieved to within 30 K with a risk of a totally wrong solution in 5 % of the cases. We conclude that it should thus be possible to distinguish the reference situation from other cases. Surface temperature map and the albedo brings important constraints on the nature or the physical state of the soil of hot super-Earths.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.