Paper detail

Constraining neutrino properties with a Euclid-like galaxy cluster survey

We perform a forecast analysis on how well a Euclid-like photometric galaxy cluster survey will constrain the total neutrino mass and effective number of neutrino species. We base our analysis on the Monte Carlo Markov Chains technique by combining information from cluster number counts and cluster power spectrum. We find that combining cluster data with CMB measurements from Planck improves by more than an order of magnitude the constraint on neutrino masses compared to each probe used independently. For the LCDM+m_nu model the 2 sigma upper limit on total neutrino mass shifts from M_nu < 0.35 eV using cluster data alone to M_nu < 0.031 eV when combined with CMB data. When a non-standard model with N_eff number of neutrino species is considered, we estimate N_eff<3.14 (95% CL), while the bounds on neutrino mass are relaxed to M_nu < 0.040 eV. This accuracy would be sufficient for a 2 sigma detection of neutrino mass even in the minimal normal hierarchy scenario. We also consider scenarios with a constant dark energy equation of state and a non-vanishing curvature. When these models are considered the error on M_nu is only slightly affected, while there is a larger impact of the order of ~ 15 % and ~ 20% respectively on the 2 sigma error bar of N_eff with respect to the standard case. We also treat the LCDM+m_nu+N_eff case with free nuisance parameters, which parameterize the uncertainties on the cluster mass determination. In this case, the upper bounds on M_nu are relaxed by a factor larger than two, M_nu < 0.083 eV (95% CL), hence compromising the possibility of detecting the total neutrino mass with good significance. We thus confirm the potential that a large optical/near-IR cluster survey, like that to be carried out by Euclid, could have in constraining neutrino properties [abridged].

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.