Paper detail

Constraining Neutrino Mass from Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay

We re-analyze the compatibility of the claimed observation of neutrinoless double beta decay ($0νββ$) in $^{76}$Ge with the new limits on the half-life of $^{136}$Xe from EXO-200 and KamLAND-Zen. Including recent calculations of the nuclear matrix elements (NMEs), we show that while the claim in $^{76}$Ge is still compatible with the individual limits from $^{136}$Xe, it is inconsistent with the KamLAND-Zen+EXO-200 combined limit for all but one NME calculations. After imposing the most stringent upper limit on the sum of light neutrino masses from Planck, we find that the canonical light neutrino contribution cannot satisfy the claimed $0νββ$ signature or saturate the current limit, irrespective of the NME uncertainties. However, inclusion of the heavy neutrino contributions, arising naturally in TeV-scale Left-Right symmetric models, can saturate the current limit of $0νββ$. In a type-II seesaw framework, this imposes a lower limit on the lightest neutrino mass. Depending on the mass hierarchy, we obtain this limit to be in the range of 0.07 - 4 meV for a typical choice of the right-handed (RH) gauge boson and RH neutrino masses relevant for their collider searches. Using the $0νββ$ bounds, we also derive correlated constraints in the RH sector, complimentary to those from the LHC.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.