Paper detail

Constraining Mass Transfer Histories of Blue Straggler Stars with COS Spectroscopy of White Dwarf Companions

Recent studies show that the majority of blue straggler stars (BSSs) in old open clusters are formed through mass transfer from an evolved star onto a main-sequence companion, resulting in a BSS and white dwarf (WD) in a binary system. We present constraints on the mass transfer histories of two BSS-WD binaries in the open cluster NGC 188, using WD temperatures and surface gravities measured with HST COS far-ultraviolet spectroscopy. Adopting a Gaia-based cluster distance of $1847\pm107$ pc, we determine that one system, WOCS 4540, formed through Case C mass transfer resulting in a CO-core white dwarf with $T_{\text{eff}}=17000^{+140}_{-200}$ K and a $\log g=7.80^{+0.06}_{-0.06}$, corresponding to a mass of $0.53^{+0.03}_{-0.03}$ $M_{\odot}$ and a cooling age of $105^{+6}_{-5}$ Myr. The other system, WOCS 5379, formed through Case B mass transfer resulting in a He-core white dwarf with $T_{\text{eff}}=15500^{+170}_{-150}$ K and a $\log g=7.50^{+0.06}_{-0.05}$, corresponding to a mass of $0.42^{+0.02}_{-0.02}$ $M_{\odot}$ and an age of $250^{+20}_{-20}$ Myr. The WD parameters are consistent across four different cluster distance assumptions. We determine possible progenitor binary systems with a grid of accretion models using MESA, and investigate whether these systems would lead to stable or unstable mass transfer. WOCS 4540 likely resulted from stable mass transfer during periastron passage in an eccentric binary system, while WOCS 5379 challenges our current understanding of the expected outcomes for mass transfer from red giant branch stars. Both systems are examples of the value in using detailed analyses to fine-tune our physical understanding of binary evolutionary processes.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.