Paper detail

Constraining large scale HI bias using redshifted 21-cm signal from the post-reionization epoch

In the absence of complex astrophysical processes that characterize the reionization era, the 21-cm emission from neutral hydrogen (HI) in the post-reionization epoch is believed to be an excellent tracer of the underlying dark matter distribution. Assuming a background cosmology, it is modelled through (i) a bias function b(k,z), which relates HI to the dark matter distribution and (ii) a mean neutral fraction (x_{HI}) which sets its amplitude. In this paper, we investigate the nature of large scale HI bias. The post-reionization HI is modelled using gravity only N-Body simulations and a suitable prescription for assigning gas to the dark matter halos. Using the simulated bias as the fiducial model for HI distribution at z\leq 4, we have generated a hypothetical data set for the 21-cm angular power spectrum (C_{l}) using a noise model based on parameters of an extended version of the GMRT. The binned C_{l} is assumed to be measured with SNR \gtrsim 4 in the range 400 \leq l \leq 8000 at a fiducial redshift z=2.5. We explore the possibility of constraining b(k) using the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on this simulated data. Our analysis shows that in the range 0.2 < k < 2 Mpc^{-1}, the simulated data set cannot distinguish between models exhibiting different k dependences, provided 1 \lesssim b(k) \lesssim 2 which sets the 2-sigma limits. This justifies the use of linear bias model on large scales. The largely uncertain x_{HI} is treated as a free parameter resulting in degradation of the bias reconstruction. The given simulated data is found to constrain the fiducial x_{HI} with an accuracy of \sim 4% (2-sigma error). The method outlined here, could be successfully implemented on future observational data sets to constrain b(k,z) and x_{HI} and thereby enhance our understanding of the low redshift Universe.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.