Paper detail

Constraining IGM enrichment and metallicity with the C IV forest correlation function

The production and distribution of metals in the diffuse intergalactic medium (IGM) have implications for galaxy formation models and the baryon (re)cycling process. The relative abundance of metals in high versus low-ionization states has also been argued to be sensitive to the Universe's reionization history. However, measurements of the background metallicity of the IGM at z~4 are sparse and in poor agreement with one another, and reduced sensitivity in the near-IR renders detecting individual metal absorbers nearly impossible. We present a new clustering-based technique that enables the detection of these weak IGM absorbers by statistically averaging over all spectral pixels, here applied to the C IV forest. We simulate the z=4.5 IGM with different models of inhomogeneous metal distributions and investigate its two-point correlation function (2PCF) using mock skewers of the C IV forest. The 2PCF demonstrates a clear peak at the doublet separation of the C IV line. The peak amplitude scales quadratically with metallicity, while enrichment morphology affects both the shape and amplitude of the 2PCF. The effect of enrichment topology can also be framed in terms of the metal mass- and volume-filling factors, and we show their trends as a function of the enrichment topology. For models consistent with the distribution of metals at z~3, we find that we can constrain [C/H] to within 0.2 dex, log$\,M_{\rm{min}}$ to within 0.4 dex, and $R$ to within 15%. We show that strong absorbers arising from the circumgalactic medium of galaxies can be easily identified and masked, allowing one to recover the underlying IGM signal. The auto-correlation of the metal-line forest presents a new and compelling avenue to simultaneously constrain IGM metallicity and enrichment topology with high precision at z>4, thereby pushing such measurements into the Epoch of Reionization.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.