Paper detail

Constraining $f(R)$ Gravity Models with The Late-Time Cosmological Evolution

The $f(R)$ Modified Gravity is a modification of Einstein's general theory of relativity, which aims to explain issues beyond The Standard Model of Cosmology such as dark energy and dark matter. As a theory of gravitation that govern major dynamics on the large scale of the universe, an $ f(R)$ model should be able to explain the transition from a matter-dominated universe to a dark-energy-dominated universe. Assuming that the density parameter of the radiation can be neglected during the transition from a matter-dominated universe to a dark-energy-dominated universe, we find some fixed points regarding the dynamical stability of the density parameters of the model. The phase transition can be achieved if the $f(R)$ model can connect the fixed point $P_5$ (representing the matter-dominated era) to the fixed point $P_1$ (representing the dark energy-dominated era). The method to evaluate that state transition is called the Fixed-point analysis. In this study, we analyze the viability of $f(R)$ models proposed by Starobinsky, Hu-Sawicki, and Gogoi-Goswami regarding the phase transition from a matter-dominated universe to a dark-energy-dominated universe. It is shown that those models are viable by choosing some set of appropriate parameters. For example, in the Starobinsky and Hu-Sawicki models, the parameter $μ$ can be chosen to correspond to the lower bound of $x_d= R_1/Rc$, where $R_1$ represents the de-Sitter point. Meanwhile, for the Gogoi-Guswami model, the same results can be achieved by taking $α$ and $β$ parameters satisfying the existence and stability conditions for the de-Sitter point. From these results, it can be concluded that those $f(R)$ models allow such phase transitions of the universe to realize the late-time accelerated expansion.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.