Paper detail

Constraining deflagration models of Type Ia supernovae through intermediate-mass elements

The physical structure of a nuclear flame is a basic ingredient of the theory of Type Ia supernovae (SNIa). Assuming an exponential density reduction with several characteristic times we have followed the evolution of a planar nuclear flame in an expanding background from an initial density 6.6 10^7 g/cm3 down to 2 10^6 g/cm3. The total amount of synthesized intermediate-mass elements (IME), from silicon to calcium, was monitored during the calculation. We have made use of the computed mass fractions, X_IME, of these elements to give an estimation of the total amount of IME synthesized during the deflagration of a massive white dwarf. Using X_IME and adopting the usual hypothesis that turbulence decouples the effective burning velocity from the laminar flame speed, so that the relevant flame speed is actually the turbulent speed on the integral length-scale, we have built a simple geometrical approach to model the region where IME are thought to be produced. It turns out that a healthy production of IME involves the combination of not too short expansion times, t_c > 0.2 s, and high turbulent intensities. According to our results it could be difficult to produce much more than 0.2 solar masses of intermediate-mass elements within the deflagrative paradigma. The calculations also suggest that the mass of IME scales with the mass of Fe-peak elements, making it difficult to conciliate energetic explosions with low ejected nickel masses, as in the well observed SN1991bg or in SN1998de. Thus a large production of Si-peak elements, especially in combination with a low or a moderate production of iron, could be better addressed by either the delayed detonation route in standard Chandrasekhar-mass models or, perhaps, by the off-center helium detonation in the sub Chandrasekhar-mass scenario.

preprint2006arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.