Paper detail

Constraining dark energy using the cross correlations of weak lensing with post-reionization probes of neutral hydrogen

We investigate the prospects of detecting the cross correlation of CMBR weak-lensing convergence field with the large scale tracers of the underlying dark matter distribution in the post-reionization epoch. The cross-correlation is then used to make error projections for dark energy equation of state (EoS)for models with a time evolving dark energy. We study the cross-correlation angular power spectrum of the weak-lensing field with the Lyman-$α$ forest and the redshifted HI 21 cm signal from the post reionization epoch. The angular power spectra is expressed as a line of sight average over the tomographic slices. We find that on using multiple $400$ hrs observation with an extended uGMRT like instrument or with a BOSS like survey with quasar (QSO) density of $16 {\rm deg}^{-2}$ the cross-correlation with weak-lensing convergence field covering half the sky can be detected at a very high SNR ($>20$). The cross-correlation of weak-lensing with Lyman-$α$ forest allows the $1-σ$ errors on the dark energy EoS parameters for different parametrizations to be constrained at a level of precision comparable to combined Planck+SNIa+BAO+HST projections. The 21-cm weak-lensing cross-correlation is found to provide strong constraints on the present value of the dark energy EoS parameter at $4\%$ for the 7CPL model. The constraints on $w_a$ is comparable ($\sim 12\%$) for models other than the 7CPL model. We also find that the CPL parametrization may not be the best constrained parametrization for dark energy evolution. The cross-correlation of CMBR weak-lensing with the post-reionization probes of neutral hydrogen thus holds the potential to give us valuable understanding about the nature of evolving dark energy.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.