Paper detail

Constraining changes in the proton-electron mass ratio with inversion and rotational lines

We report deep Green Bank Telescope (GBT) spectroscopy in the redshifted NH$_3$~(1,1), CS~1-0 and H$_2$CO~0$_{\rm 00}$-1$_{\rm 01}$ lines from the $z \sim 0.685$ absorber towards B0218+357. The inversion (NH$_3$) and rotational (CS, H$_2$CO) line frequencies have different dependences on the proton-electron mass ratio $μ$, implying that a comparison between the line redshifts is sensitive to changes in $μ$. A joint 3-component fit to the NH$_3$, CS, and H$_2$CO lines yields $[Δμ/μ] = (-3.5 \pm 1.2) \times 10^{-7}$, from $z \sim 0.685$ to today, where the error includes systematic effects from comparing lines from different species and possible frequency-dependent source morphology. Two additional sources of systematic error remain, due to time variability in the source morphology and velocity offsets between nitrogen-bearing and carbon-bearing species. We find no statistically-significant ($\ge 3 σ$) evidence for changes in $μ$, and obtain the stringent $3σ$ constraint, $[Δμ/μ] < 3.6 \times 10^{-7}$, over 6.2~Gyrs; this is the best present limit on temporal changes in $μ$ from any technique, and for any lookback time, by a factor $\gtrsim 5$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.