Paper detail

Constraining $α$-attractor models from reheating

We eliminate the parameters originally present in models of inflation of the $α$-attractor type in favor of the scalar spectral index $n_s$ and the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$. We then write expressions for the number of $e$-folds during reheating $ N_ {re} $. By imposing reasonable conditions on $N_{re}$ we can restrict $n_s$ and $r$ and in turn, we use these constraints in order to find bounds for cosmological quantities of interest such as the number of $e$-folds during inflation and the radiation dominated eras, as well as for the reheating temperature and the running index. The minimum condition that $N_ {re}$ must satisfy is $N_ {re}\geq 0$ which we use to constrain the cosmological quantities mentioned above. In particular, we find that the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$ (and as a consequence the energy scale of inflation) is bounded from below. We provide figures illustrating the behavior of these quantities as functions of $r$ for several values of $n_s$ and tables containing the bounds so obtained.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.